- Note From An Alienated Dad
- PA for DUMMIES
- Parental Alienation
- Main Alienators
- Alienated Children Speak out
- 3 VIDEOS explain PA
- Cross Country Parental Alienation Awareness Tour
- I CAN'T BE A FATHER
- Recent Articles
- An Alienated Child's View
- FACEBOOK posts
- Alienacion Parental (Spanish)
- The Rejected/ Targeted Parent
- Books on PAS
- Memories of a Monster
- Judge Gorcyca: PA most devastating Issue
- Infamous Alienators
- Kick Parental Alienation's @$$
- Women vs PA
- The Step Parent
- Videos: Parents Speak out
- A New Hope
- I Am The Alienator
- It Happens To Moms Too
- Borrowed Content
- PA Movies to Watch
- Shared Parenting
- A Broken System
- San Bernardino Family Court
- Awareness in our Schools
- Law And Disorder
Please like and share. Also leave me a comment if you have had a similar experience with a judge.
Alienating Parent's husband
Mike's Declaration (Below)
Joe's Declaration (Response)
Targeted Parent's Wife
Tammy's Declaration (Response)
THIS IS CHRISTINE "CHRISTY" GARRISON'S Ex Parte filed on August 7, 2012
People with personality disorders are champions of Projection. Psychological Projection is when people defend themselves against unpleasant or unacceptable behaviors by denying their existence in themselves, while attributing them to others. I could just comment here and state that everything in her Ex Parte declaration is classic projection of what Christy herself is like. But instead I broke it down. I tried to be brief and not convolute the issue further.
8/1/2012 "Note the date. It is the next day after I had a conversation where Christy is saying to give Megan time. Give her one week, two weeks and we won't have to go to court. Also it is just days after an audio recording where Christy is extremely upset with me. Not because of anything above which is not true at all. But because she believes that I was the one who exposed the fact that her 24 year old son was dating a 15 year old. THIS WAS NEVER ABOUT ANYTHING OTHER THAN A NARCISSISTIC RAGE OF CHRISTY GARRISON FOR BEING FOUND OUT.
To the courts of San Bernardino county,
I am requesting this Ex Parte order because Megan has expressed significant concerns regarding her father's behaviors during visitation times.
Megan is a very bright, loving child who is active in sports, gymnastics and an honor roll student. Not anymore, Megan has quit gymnastics, Again. Switched schools twice. once without my knowledge. She has been suspended from school. She is still very bright and that adds to her credibility as a mouthpiece for Christy.
She is responsible, respectful and trustworthy, therefore her feelings in this matter concerns me.
He has manifested the idea that Megan is feeling this way because “he is being a good parent” however fails to see the true issue at hand. I really don't fail to see it. It is very clear to me.
His need for complete control (take note of this word and how she uses it frequently. Eventually Megan begins to parrot her mother and uses words like controlling and manipulative. A great question for Christy would be: If I am so controlling and manipulative why is she the one calling ALL the shots and having things go her way? If I am controlling and manipulative then I must not be that good at it.) over her often results with him and his wife (and now my wife is abusive?) using foul language, inappropriate yelling and hurtful comments to her.
Megan has expressed to me on several occasions, he and his wife "bashes" me and my family directly to her and others who are not directly involved.
This often consists of Gym parents, school teachers multimedia sources such as Facebook. in the past, this has been an ongoing issue regarding his control,(Theres that word again) emotional abuse and psychiatric instability. So now you're a therapist?
Megan and Joe have continued counseling in the past year to work through these issues, however there has been little to no improvement in Joe's behavior. The counseling was my idea for Megan because Christy insisted that the "real" Megan is different than the wonderful daughter she is when she is with me and my family. The loving, no drama, level headed, sweet, independent thinking, young lady according to Christy, is not the real Megan. So I suggested counseling. Christy shot me down stating that her family doesn't need counseling.
During visitation times, she is subjected to intense questioning, lecturing, corrosion and bullying. Project much? Interesting, these are all the things that Christy does.AND all the things which Sheri Glendenning, the biological mother if the other 2 children in Christy's house accuses Christy doing in the audio recordings.
Once more, Megan expresses that she is very afraid of her father as she has seen abuse in their home in the past. False accusation.
Her visits often consist of her doing exactly what he expects from her without deviation. Sometimes, I don't even know how to respond to Christy's deranged accusations. I really don't . What do I say to this?
I have continued to express my concerns with Joe; however he often makes no attempt to resolve the issues.
As we have continued to work through this, her therapist (Shirley Stutson) has been very effective in allowing Megan to open up and trust the relationship she has between her and her therapist. Again, this is Christy's bought and paid for therapist, Shirley Stutson MFT Victorville.
Unfortunately, Joe has made it impossible for Megan to tolerate his behaviors and is now refusing to visit with him and his wife.
Now I am in a situation where, Megan has very valid, points in regards to her visits however, I understand I must abide by our court order. She understood that she had to until Commissioner Daniel said this, "I can tell you that in my experience no law enforcement officer is going to force a teenager to engage in a visit."
He refused and is insistent with his visits with disregard for her feelings at this point. Disregarding Christy's feelings.
He believes that we should force her to go, using physical means to make this happen, as this was done in the past. Not true, but most of this isn't either.
I feel that this point, forcing her even: physically may enhance her fears and increase psychological harm. Spoken by a mother who is completely disregarding the harm she is causing our daughter by teaching her to hate her father.
He continues to speak negatively on Facebook, to our mutual friends and family, posting derogatory comments about me and her therapist. Not derogatory.
I don't feel that Joe has made clear, appropriate decisions that is healthy for our daughter, thus further counseling is needed.
I ask the court to please keep Megan's best interest in mind, and allowing her to continue visits when she is ready.
The only person who can really explain what is going on here is Megan. A staple of an alienating parent is when they insist that courts or mediators hear it directly from their children. They know they have complete control over them and like Christy says. "She will say what she needs to say."
What she is experiencing is real to her; it is her feelings and concerns.
Other family members and friends have also expressed their concerns for Megan's well being while she is with: Joe; therefore I seek guidance from the court to allow this temporary order.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
"I can tell you that in my experience no law enforcement officer is going to force a teenager to engage in a visit."
This is what we filed: